Trialfacts vs In-house or Investigator Site Recruitment

Trialfacts expertise and experience in patient recruitment provides increased certainty over in-house or investigator site recruitment in meeting patient recruitment deadlines.
In-house or Investigator
Site Recruitment
vs
Trialfacts Managed
Patient Recruitment
Reliance on site/CRO/sponsor staff who lack marketing expertise Trialfacts' team is made up of marketing experts and specialists in clinical trial patient recruitment
Staff are drawn away from their core roles to undertake and coordinate advertising and screening Trialfacts provides a managed solution which includes screening, allowing staff to focus on their core roles
Staff are familiar with traditional advertising & generally limit themselves to these mediums In addition to traditional advertising, Trialfacts specialises in online patient recruitment and PR campaigns
Recruitment efforts are uncoordinated across
sites and mediums 		Trialfacts ensures all advertising and PR efforts compliment and build upon each other, and accesses discounted advertising rates through combined purchasing power
Recruitment metrics are not measured
 Trialfacts provides up to date reporting of referrals by site and measures ROI across recruitment efforts to drive down cost per randomisation
Cost: You pay retail media costs. Additional advertising is required as recruitment efforts and sites underperform,and sponsors lose revenue as trials are delayed. Cost: Trialfacts can provide solutions at comparable cost through more effective and efficient recruitment, and combined purchasing power to purchase media packages at wholesale rates.

See how we've helped research organisations and what they have to say about us.

Contact us to find out how we can ensure your trial recruits on time or rescue your trial from patient recruitment delays.

Join our newsletter to receive local clinical trial & patient recruitment news.